Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 46948 for show's.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 46948 for show's.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin W. Mitchell
To withdraw a plea before sentencing, the defendant must show a fair and just reason for doing so. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3195 - 2017-09-19
To withdraw a plea before sentencing, the defendant must show a fair and just reason for doing so. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3195 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
court shall reopen a default judgment if “the defendant … shows … that the failure to appear was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
court shall reopen a default judgment if “the defendant … shows … that the failure to appear was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factors. Id., ¶¶30-35. If the defendant makes that showing, the burden shifts to the State to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
factors. Id., ¶¶30-35. If the defendant makes that showing, the burden shifts to the State to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that sexual intercourse occurred because there was insufficient evidence to show that he had penetrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34249 - 2014-09-15
that sexual intercourse occurred because there was insufficient evidence to show that he had penetrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34249 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of inaccurate information at the sentencing hearing ‘must show both that the information was inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115157 - 2014-06-29
of inaccurate information at the sentencing hearing ‘must show both that the information was inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115157 - 2014-06-29
State v. William W. Bair
the burden to show that it was unreasonable; it is presumed that the trial court acted reasonably. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2833 - 2005-03-31
the burden to show that it was unreasonable; it is presumed that the trial court acted reasonably. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2833 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
showing of prejudicial error. See Zimbrick v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 106, ¶9, 235 Wis. 2d 132, 613 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019571 - 2025-10-09
showing of prejudicial error. See Zimbrick v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 106, ¶9, 235 Wis. 2d 132, 613 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019571 - 2025-10-09
State v. Reginald D. Moore
the statistics to which Moore cites show a disparity in treatment, we cannot say the trial court’s explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2588 - 2005-03-31
the statistics to which Moore cites show a disparity in treatment, we cannot say the trial court’s explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2588 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald D. Moore
the statistics to which Moore cites show a disparity in treatment, we cannot say the trial court’s explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2396 - 2005-03-31
the statistics to which Moore cites show a disparity in treatment, we cannot say the trial court’s explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2396 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments is that the evidence was insufficient to show that he misrepresented any fact. On certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108715 - 2014-03-05
arguments is that the evidence was insufficient to show that he misrepresented any fact. On certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108715 - 2014-03-05