Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10331 - 10340 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

State v. Wesley H.
). Whether a petition is sufficient is a matter of law subject to this court’s de novo review. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3953 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings de novo, citing Racine Education Association v. Board of Education for Racine Unified School
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192742 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 154
of constitutional fact de novo.4 Id. The determination of whether a search is a probation search or a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] United Capitol Insurance Company v. Bartolotta's Fireworks Company, Inc.
. We recognize that a de jure consent requirement would offer some protection for insureds who may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8469 - 2017-09-19

Fred A. Barry v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
and, therefore, the trial court’s resolution of that issue is subject to our de novo review. See Gloudeman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14457 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶25. Though a criminal defendant has a constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157895 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
without proration. We begin with the applicable standard of review, followed by a de novo examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140361 - 2015-04-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that appellate courts review de novo. See Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d 1, 23, 586 N.W.2d 52 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030687 - 2025-10-30

2010 WI APP 36
owe no deference to the Commission and will conduct a de novo review if it is clear that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46203 - 2010-03-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236315 - 2019-02-28