Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10351 - 10360 of 83031 for case search.
Search results 10351 - 10360 of 83031 for case search.
State v. Ronald W. Mau
considered whether the police had a reasonable suspicion in that case to order blood drawn in a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15132 - 2005-03-31
considered whether the police had a reasonable suspicion in that case to order blood drawn in a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the same relief: case No. 2014CV238, Slocum v. Star Prairie Township; case No. 2014CV239, Slocum v. Star
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162923 - 2017-09-21
the same relief: case No. 2014CV238, Slocum v. Star Prairie Township; case No. 2014CV239, Slocum v. Star
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162923 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald W. Mau
, the formula which was used in this case. No. 99-0406-CR 3 ineffective. The court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15132 - 2017-09-21
, the formula which was used in this case. No. 99-0406-CR 3 ineffective. The court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15132 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keyun Utsey
its sentencing discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has a somewhat protracted procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19728 - 2017-09-21
its sentencing discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has a somewhat protracted procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19728 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and remained in custody while the case was pending. Another jail inmate, Ronald Woods, contacted the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29887 - 2014-09-15
and remained in custody while the case was pending. Another jail inmate, Ronald Woods, contacted the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29887 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in an unreasonable refusal. Because the trial court erred in concluding that the arrest in this case was valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20082 - 2014-09-15
in an unreasonable refusal. Because the trial court erred in concluding that the arrest in this case was valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20082 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
15, 2006, Jacobson was arrested for operating after revocation. Officers searched Jacobson’s vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78477 - 2012-02-21
15, 2006, Jacobson was arrested for operating after revocation. Officers searched Jacobson’s vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78477 - 2012-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was arrested for operating after revocation. Officers searched Jacobson’s vehicle and discovered two “gem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78477 - 2014-09-15
was arrested for operating after revocation. Officers searched Jacobson’s vehicle and discovered two “gem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78477 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury’s answer, an appellate court will search for credible evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251427 - 2019-12-13
a jury’s answer, an appellate court will search for credible evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251427 - 2019-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010 WI 81, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993192 - 2025-08-07
protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010 WI 81, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993192 - 2025-08-07