Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10351 - 10360 of 16451 for commenting.

COURT OF APPEALS
upon hearing counsel’s comment, raising the issue only later upon seeing the transcript. We observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109391 - 2014-03-25

[PDF] State v. James L.C.
counsel commented: The only statement I would make is you're always concerned when you represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8112 - 2017-09-19

State v. William F. Jorgensen
there is a basis for doing so that is not frivolous”) and SCR 20:3.1 comment (frivolity is found where the lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6647 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
). The court explained: Commentators have concluded that Rule 60(b)(5) was intended to preserve for the courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86294 - 2012-08-20

[PDF] State v. Israel Saldana
was indefensible. 4 By his comments, counsel was attempting to persuade the jury that it was not enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
about a number of people who may have made negative comments about Molnar or behaved suspiciously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34770 - 2008-12-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
anything to do with her decision to plead no contest. ¶16 Moreover, the circuit court’s comments about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20

[PDF] State v. Becky L. Eastman
seeking.” While the court later commented that, as a policy matter, it believed that a “judge ought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12798 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Leonard A. Sarnowski
to. The court specifically commented on its efforts to renovate a house during the same period of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7371 - 2017-09-20

Shannon S. v. Jackson C.
with the jury instruction comment that the statute is employing a presumption that the conception occurred from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7035 - 2005-03-31