Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10371 - 10380 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 10371 - 10380 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Circuit court eFiling - Docketing a judgment – Wisconsin Court System eFile Support
. Find the case by entering the case number or caption in the search filter fields on the My cases page
/hc/en-us/articles/25013751395341-Circuit-court-eFiling-Docketing-a-judgment
. Find the case by entering the case number or caption in the search filter fields on the My cases page
/hc/en-us/articles/25013751395341-Circuit-court-eFiling-Docketing-a-judgment
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acres of DEKK’s land in fee simple, 0.0001 acres as a permanent limited easement, and 0.13 acres
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=477478 - 2022-01-27
acres of DEKK’s land in fee simple, 0.0001 acres as a permanent limited easement, and 0.13 acres
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=477478 - 2022-01-27
State v. Vito George Ambrosia
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10076 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a child. A few weeks after the State filed the complaint in that case, the police executed a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458073 - 2021-11-30
to a child. A few weeks after the State filed the complaint in that case, the police executed a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458073 - 2021-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
J.D.J.’s objections to testimony from the County’s witnesses at the conclusion of the County’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625636 - 2023-02-22
J.D.J.’s objections to testimony from the County’s witnesses at the conclusion of the County’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625636 - 2023-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, McGregory moved to suppress the evidence from the mailbox, alleging an illegal, warrantless search. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546054 - 2022-07-26
, McGregory moved to suppress the evidence from the mailbox, alleging an illegal, warrantless search. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546054 - 2022-07-26
[PDF]
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10619 - 2017-09-20
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10619 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the result of an unlawful search and was therefore in violation of the Fourth Amendment. ¶2 In contrast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
as the result of an unlawful search and was therefore in violation of the Fourth Amendment. ¶2 In contrast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05