Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10381 - 10390 of 63530 for records.
Search results 10381 - 10390 of 63530 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the reports, and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the reports, and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
. As a result, the dispositive issue is whether the record supports the court's finding that Hageny accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20
. As a result, the dispositive issue is whether the record supports the court's finding that Hageny accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Mahnke
to support the conviction. However, in doing so he concedes that the existing record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8557 - 2017-09-19
to support the conviction. However, in doing so he concedes that the existing record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, see WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239868 - 2019-05-01
of the record that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, see WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239868 - 2019-05-01
State v. Donald P. Sullivan
the overall record that the court misused its discretion. We agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10129 - 2005-03-31
the overall record that the court misused its discretion. We agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10129 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111898 - 2014-05-04
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111898 - 2014-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his request for prompt disposition. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320501 - 2021-01-06
his request for prompt disposition. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320501 - 2021-01-06
State v. Perry R. Neal
for in camera inspection of Patricia’s medical records. Postconviction counsel then filed a motion claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7504 - 2005-03-31
for in camera inspection of Patricia’s medical records. Postconviction counsel then filed a motion claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
to file a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987058 - 2025-07-22
review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987058 - 2025-07-22