Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10391 - 10400 of 19116 for citi.

[PDF] State v. Jose A. Sianez
is correct. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, subject to de novo review. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9090 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Geoffrey Chapman
of authority. Id. ¶4 Now, we apply the facts to the law. A city of Oshkosh police officer, on routine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4333 - 2017-09-19

Samuels Recycling Company v. Continental Casualty Company
, it was not a “suit seeking damages.” City of Edgerton v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin, 184 Wis. 2d 750, 786, 517
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1233 - 2005-01-26

COURT OF APPEALS
no file stamp and is not in the record. The appendix is not the record. United Rentals, Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135536 - 2015-02-24

COURT OF APPEALS
) and the Wisconsin Property Assessment Manual. Johnson v. City of Greenfield Bd. of Review, 2005 WI App 156, ¶7, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65485 - 2011-06-08

State v. Priest Johnson
Spring Drive, with[in] the City of Milwaukee. The above listed location is that of the United State[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26211 - 2006-08-14

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
May 28, 2025 2023AP000386 A to Z Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. City of Ashland 3 Ashland PDF May 28
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=05/28/2025&end_date=05/28/2025

Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
as a city attorney in Albany, New Glarus and Monticello. He was appointed chief judge of the Fifth Judicial
/news/thirdbranch/apr24/retirements.htm - 2026-03-14

Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
historic journey continued as she became the first African American to serve on the Milwaukee City Council
/news/thirdbranch/may24/velphillips.htm - 2026-03-14

[PDF] Nick Radmer v. Carl Krueger Construction, Inc.
, [claim preclusion] generally will bar the second suit.’” Id. at 554 (quoting Pliska v. City of Stevens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5036 - 2017-09-19