Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1041 - 1050 of 69394 for as he.
Search results 1041 - 1050 of 69394 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as a repeater, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief, in which he asserted that plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252624 - 2020-01-22
, as a repeater, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief, in which he asserted that plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252624 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
relief. Murray argues he is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea based on an alleged misunderstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49474 - 2014-09-15
relief. Murray argues he is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea based on an alleged misunderstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49474 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, and an order denying postconviction relief. Robertson argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80692 - 2012-04-09
offense, and an order denying postconviction relief. Robertson argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80692 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
verdict question asking whether John L.-B. knew or had reason to believe he was T.J.’s father. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96892 - 2014-09-15
verdict question asking whether John L.-B. knew or had reason to believe he was T.J.’s father. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96892 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to “yes,” on a special verdict question asking whether John L.-B. knew or had reason to believe he was T.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96892 - 2013-05-15
to “yes,” on a special verdict question asking whether John L.-B. knew or had reason to believe he was T.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96892 - 2013-05-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
scene to wait in the back of his squad car while he sorts things out. However, because Kuklinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
scene to wait in the back of his squad car while he sorts things out. However, because Kuklinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
drivers at an accident scene to wait in the back of his squad car while he sorts things out. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
drivers at an accident scene to wait in the back of his squad car while he sorts things out. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 947.01(1) and 968.075(1)(a) (2013-14). 3 He argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149443 - 2017-09-21
), contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 947.01(1) and 968.075(1)(a) (2013-14). 3 He argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149443 - 2017-09-21
State v. William H. Jones
. William H. Jones claims that he reasonably refused to allow police officers to test him for blood alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15086 - 2005-03-31
. William H. Jones claims that he reasonably refused to allow police officers to test him for blood alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15086 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and underlining omitted.). He claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
, and underlining omitted.). He claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14