Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1041 - 1050 of 63575 for judgment for ms.
Search results 1041 - 1050 of 63575 for judgment for ms.
[PDF]
State v. David J. Roberson
("Roberson") seeks review of a published decision by the court of appeals affirming both his judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25747 - 2017-09-21
("Roberson") seeks review of a published decision by the court of appeals affirming both his judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25747 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: CRAIG R. DAY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: CRAIG R. DAY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: Craig R. Day, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107420 - 2014-01-29
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: Craig R. Day, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107420 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel, filed a motion for postconviction relief. Citing the findings of Dr. Friedman and Ms. Shields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03
counsel, filed a motion for postconviction relief. Citing the findings of Dr. Friedman and Ms. Shields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s reasoning regarding those issues. Ms. Hackbarth did not comply with either Rule 809.19(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26677 - 2006-10-09
the trial court’s reasoning regarding those issues. Ms. Hackbarth did not comply with either Rule 809.19(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26677 - 2006-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
reasoning regarding those issues. Ms. Hackbarth did not comply with either RULE 809.19(2)(a) or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26677 - 2014-09-15
reasoning regarding those issues. Ms. Hackbarth did not comply with either RULE 809.19(2)(a) or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26677 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Wisconsin Commission on Children, Families and the Courts
Defender's Office Ms. Julie Incitti, Education Consultant Department of Public Instruction LaMikka James
/courts/committees/ccipcommission.htm - 2026-02-15
Defender's Office Ms. Julie Incitti, Education Consultant Department of Public Instruction LaMikka James
/courts/committees/ccipcommission.htm - 2026-02-15
Wisconsin Court System - Chief Justice's COVID-19 Task Force
Affiliation/Location Chief Justice Patience Roggensack Wisconsin Supreme Court Ms. Diane Fremgen Deputy
/courts/committees/covid19.htm - 2026-02-15
Affiliation/Location Chief Justice Patience Roggensack Wisconsin Supreme Court Ms. Diane Fremgen Deputy
/courts/committees/covid19.htm - 2026-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
advised the circuit court, “This is not the only insurance claim that Ms. Laddusire has made that arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256673 - 2020-03-17
advised the circuit court, “This is not the only insurance claim that Ms. Laddusire has made that arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256673 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition comments from Patel
November 29, 2013 Ms. Carrie Janto Supreme Court of Wisconsin P.O.Box 1688 Madison, WI
/supreme/docs/1308commentspatel.pdf - 2013-12-03
November 29, 2013 Ms. Carrie Janto Supreme Court of Wisconsin P.O.Box 1688 Madison, WI
/supreme/docs/1308commentspatel.pdf - 2013-12-03