Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10401 - 10410 of 77092 for search which.

Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
constitutional event from the draw of his blood, which cannot be justified on the basis of the “exigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, is based on Johnson’s testimony alone, as it is undisputed that Johnson’s home was not searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107529 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to embark on our own search of the record, unguided by references, to look for evidence to support Grube’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88872 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of the campground. At the time he encountered Houle, Gruss was driving a “Gator,” which he described as being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35972 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Tommy Smith, Jr. v. Daren Swenson
on an appeal from his convictions. We affirmed those convictions in August 2003, after which the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18681 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
the draw of his blood, which cannot be justified on the basis of the “exigent circumstances” exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
searched the area and approached a residence with a lawnmower parked in the driveway. After the officers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906919 - 2025-01-28

State v. Corrine L. Brazee
"The application of issue preclusion doctrines to a given set of facts presents a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4086 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶36. Tate has failed to meet this burden. The change to which Tate refers occurred several years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114105 - 2014-06-09

State v. Terry Jackson
the defense are questions of law which this court decides without deference to the trial court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7804 - 2005-03-31