Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10411 - 10420 of 18718 for quote.

State v. Milton H. Smith
, 15 (Ct. App. 1989) (quoted source omitted). “This means that a driver must be informed of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert J. Capps
.” State v. Johnson, 210 Wis.2d 197, 201, 565 N.W.2d 191, 193 (Ct. App. 1997), quoting State v. Bangert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
’” is not enough to establish reasonable suspicion. Id. (quoted source omitted). ¶11 Bilquist argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122323 - 2014-09-22

[PDF] State v. Eric J. Gadach
. (quoting McCleary v. State, 49 Wis.2d 263, 277, 182 N.W.2d 512, 519 (1971)). When sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11846 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” See id., ¶20 (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the parties.’” State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶40, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828 (quoting Rosado v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878176 - 2024-11-19

[PDF] NOTICE
actually accomplished. Id., ¶41 (quoting Kelsey C.R., 243 Wis. 2d 422, ¶36). ¶18 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59077 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 478, ¶5 (quoting another source). As we stated, Calzadas does not challenge the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147971 - 2015-09-02

Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
at 536-37 (quoted source omitted). We think John R.’s Bachowski argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12169 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
representing that the driveway would be poured using a six-bag mix and testified that all of his quotes state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79054 - 2012-03-06