Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10421 - 10430 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 10421 - 10430 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Jarrod H.
no factual findings, only legal issues remain and, therefore, our review is de novo.” Westhaven Assocs. Ltd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6846 - 2005-03-31
no factual findings, only legal issues remain and, therefore, our review is de novo.” Westhaven Assocs. Ltd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
3 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160384 - 2017-09-21
3 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kyle J. Nelson
cause under a de novo standard of review. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21
cause under a de novo standard of review. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court’s findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous, but we “review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965317 - 2025-06-04
. The trial court’s findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous, but we “review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965317 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795383 - 2024-05-07
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795383 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneous; and (2) we then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07
erroneous; and (2) we then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
State v. John M. Ligon
. Whether a statute is constitutional is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5008 - 2017-09-19
. Whether a statute is constitutional is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5008 - 2017-09-19
Equity Development,Inc. v. Kim Ayers
an issue of law, which we review de novo. See DeMars v. LaPour, 123 Wis.2d 366, 370, 366 N.W.2d 891, 893
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11474 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law, which we review de novo. See DeMars v. LaPour, 123 Wis.2d 366, 370, 366 N.W.2d 891, 893
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11474 - 2005-03-31
Norda, Inc. v. Wisconsin Educational Approval Board
. The Board appeals. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25323 - 2006-06-27
. The Board appeals. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25323 - 2006-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
follows. ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30
follows. ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30