Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10421 - 10430 of 69658 for had.
Search results 10421 - 10430 of 69658 for had.
State v. Frank S. Smith
an entrapment defense. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
an entrapment defense. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
Clarence 2X Price v. Ken Morgan
segregation, lost five days of good time, had his security rating changed from minimum to medium
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
segregation, lost five days of good time, had his security rating changed from minimum to medium
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Axelson
of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree, and affirm. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree, and affirm. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 28, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
to the implied consent law and therefore he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28519 - 2007-03-27
to the implied consent law and therefore he had a medical reason for his refusal. He asserts that his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28519 - 2007-03-27
State v. Ralph Axelson
held that all of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
held that all of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
Thomas E. Johnston v. Barbara A. Johnston
rejected that option because it had "serious concerns as to her ability to manage these assets." Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9636 - 2005-03-31
rejected that option because it had "serious concerns as to her ability to manage these assets." Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
in open court that he had failed to visit or communicate with the child for a period of three or more
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David T.O.
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
plea, which prevented him from learning that his family had located a witness who would exonerate him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58775 - 2014-09-15
plea, which prevented him from learning that his family had located a witness who would exonerate him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58775 - 2014-09-15
State v. Randy A. Weishar
motion to dismiss the charges because the State had allegedly not produced potentially exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3774 - 2005-03-31
motion to dismiss the charges because the State had allegedly not produced potentially exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3774 - 2005-03-31