Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10421 - 10430 of 72821 for we.
Search results 10421 - 10430 of 72821 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We conclude that Hammersley’s claims are procedurally barred. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
. We conclude that Hammersley’s claims are procedurally barred. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
[PDF]
State v. Lauri Mohr
and she therefore did not knowingly and voluntarily enter the plea. We reject the State's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9490 - 2017-09-19
and she therefore did not knowingly and voluntarily enter the plea. We reject the State's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9490 - 2017-09-19
Dale Wiggins v. John C. Butorac
, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On March 2, 1998, West Allis Police Office Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15496 - 2005-03-31
, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On March 2, 1998, West Allis Police Office Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15496 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Diane M. Somers
to the blood test was justified by fear for her own safety. We reject the arguments and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
to the blood test was justified by fear for her own safety. We reject the arguments and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
Norman Hans Rechsteiner v. Karen Hildegarde Rechsteiner
are not supported by the facts or any rational basis. We conclude the record supports the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10532 - 2005-03-31
are not supported by the facts or any rational basis. We conclude the record supports the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10532 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial. We affirm. I. Background ¶2 Initially Perry was charged with second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
for a new trial. We affirm. I. Background ¶2 Initially Perry was charged with second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
State v. Ricky McMorris
identification. The trial court denied the motion. We previously granted McMorris's petition for leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9434 - 2005-03-31
identification. The trial court denied the motion. We previously granted McMorris's petition for leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9434 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Miller
and error by the trial court in finding that § 944.20(1)(b) was not unconstitutionally broad and vague. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7485 - 2005-03-31
and error by the trial court in finding that § 944.20(1)(b) was not unconstitutionally broad and vague. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger S. Walker
counsel. Because we conclude that Walker’s trial counsel was No(s). 00-2576-CR 2 ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3061 - 2017-09-19
counsel. Because we conclude that Walker’s trial counsel was No(s). 00-2576-CR 2 ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3061 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
) the sentence imposed was excessive. Because each claim is resolved in favor of upholding the order, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27500 - 2006-12-18
) the sentence imposed was excessive. Because each claim is resolved in favor of upholding the order, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27500 - 2006-12-18