Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10431 - 10440 of 19116 for citi.
Search results 10431 - 10440 of 19116 for citi.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Steven Beal of the City of Racine Police Department testified that he was in his squad car when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
Steven Beal of the City of Racine Police Department testified that he was in his squad car when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by its “noncompliance with statutory requirements[.]” City of Eau Claire v. Booth, 2016 WI 65, ¶7, 370
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010041 - 2025-09-16
by its “noncompliance with statutory requirements[.]” City of Eau Claire v. Booth, 2016 WI 65, ¶7, 370
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010041 - 2025-09-16
John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
there are no disputed material facts and only legal issues are presented. See Preloznik v. City of Madison, 113 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12248 - 2013-11-18
there are no disputed material facts and only legal issues are presented. See Preloznik v. City of Madison, 113 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12248 - 2013-11-18
Earl E. Grunwald v. Milwaukee Casualty Insurance
unless they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Mentzel v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25981 - 2010-05-18
unless they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Mentzel v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25981 - 2010-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
based on City of Racine police officer David Shortess’ affidavits. The affidavits refer to information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
based on City of Racine police officer David Shortess’ affidavits. The affidavits refer to information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2009 WI 70, ¶7, 318 Wis. 2d 681
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2009 WI 70, ¶7, 318 Wis. 2d 681
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31
State v. Mark H. Brooks
affirm the judgment of conviction and the order. ¶2 Officer Stuart R. Van Swol of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31
affirm the judgment of conviction and the order. ¶2 Officer Stuart R. Van Swol of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not preclude a second suppression hearing. See City of Wisconsin Dells v. Dells Fireworks, Inc., 197 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33791 - 2014-09-15
not preclude a second suppression hearing. See City of Wisconsin Dells v. Dells Fireworks, Inc., 197 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joseph W. Volkmann v. Superior Home Services, Inc.
to determine if well-informed persons should have become confused. Milwaukee Fire Fighters Ass’n v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4689 - 2017-09-19
to determine if well-informed persons should have become confused. Milwaukee Fire Fighters Ass’n v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4689 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
LIRC’s decision, not that of the circuit court. City of Kenosha v. LIRC, 2011 WI App 51, ¶7, 332 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149316 - 2017-09-21
LIRC’s decision, not that of the circuit court. City of Kenosha v. LIRC, 2011 WI App 51, ¶7, 332 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149316 - 2017-09-21