Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10431 - 10440 of 30177 for de.
Search results 10431 - 10440 of 30177 for de.
Lee Knowlin v. Director
to dismiss tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. It raises a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12055 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. It raises a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo an appeal of a LIRC decision dealing with the scope of its own power. Wright v. LIRC
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586372 - 2022-11-09
review de novo an appeal of a LIRC decision dealing with the scope of its own power. Wright v. LIRC
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586372 - 2022-11-09
[PDF]
Waupaca County Department of Human Services v. Jennifer M.A.
182 (1998). Because this requires interpretation of a statute, our review is de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6441 - 2017-09-19
182 (1998). Because this requires interpretation of a statute, our review is de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6441 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
over the dates on which Gulley was in custody, we will determine de novo the appropriate amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15238 - 2017-09-21
over the dates on which Gulley was in custody, we will determine de novo the appropriate amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Robert K.
Application of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
Application of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether Russell was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
was deficient and whether Russell was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
Waupaca County Department of Human Services v. Jennifer M.A.
of a statute, our review is de novo. Id. Wisconsin Stat. § 48.426 reads: (1) Court considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6441 - 2005-03-31
of a statute, our review is de novo. Id. Wisconsin Stat. § 48.426 reads: (1) Court considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6441 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129031 - 2014-11-18
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129031 - 2014-11-18