Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10431 - 10440 of 69658 for had.
Search results 10431 - 10440 of 69658 for had.
State v. Carl A. Knoll
is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for the offense—specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13104 - 2005-03-31
is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for the offense—specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13104 - 2005-03-31
State v. William A. Gasper
not identified any defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10941 - 2005-03-31
not identified any defense that would have been available had the timeframe been further narrowed. Gasper had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
owed at $162.72. 2 Armstrong had signed and discussed with his lawyer a plea questionnaire which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac
of res judicata. Firstar asserted that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3855 - 2005-03-31
of res judicata. Firstar asserted that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3855 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged a defect in the plea colloquy because the circuit court had not reviewed the elements of burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107714 - 2014-02-03
alleged a defect in the plea colloquy because the circuit court had not reviewed the elements of burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107714 - 2014-02-03
State v. Charles E. Snodgrass
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gail B. Eder v. Daniel P. Merline
, the court limited her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15312 - 2017-09-21
, the court limited her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Deborah J. Bull v. City of St. Croix Falls
. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from further damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from further damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that either the vehicle was going down the road with its headlights off and then had turned them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86350 - 2012-08-23
concluded that either the vehicle was going down the road with its headlights off and then had turned them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86350 - 2012-08-23