Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10441 - 10450 of 30177 for de.
Search results 10441 - 10450 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
over the dates on which Gulley was in custody, we will determine de novo the appropriate amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15238 - 2017-09-21
over the dates on which Gulley was in custody, we will determine de novo the appropriate amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Robert K.
Application of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
Application of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7640 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether Russell was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
was deficient and whether Russell was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
determining whether a fact pattern violates a defendant’s due process rights is an issue of law reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28891 - 2014-09-15
determining whether a fact pattern violates a defendant’s due process rights is an issue of law reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28891 - 2014-09-15
Waupaca County Department of Human Services v. Jennifer M.A.
of a statute, our review is de novo. Id. Wisconsin Stat. § 48.426 reads: (1) Court considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6441 - 2005-03-31
of a statute, our review is de novo. Id. Wisconsin Stat. § 48.426 reads: (1) Court considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6441 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129031 - 2014-11-18
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129031 - 2014-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17
Tiffany N. v. Kareem W.
is timely under Wis. Stat. § 806.07 is a question of statutory construction which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2726 - 2005-03-31
is timely under Wis. Stat. § 806.07 is a question of statutory construction which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2726 - 2005-03-31