Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10441 - 10450 of 68257 for law.

[PDF] State v. Rick A. Knutson
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. For a police officer to make an investigative stop, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10975 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Bank One v. R & R Hydro, Inc.
reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10326 - 2017-09-20

Bank One v. R & R Hydro, Inc.
have known that the appeal was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10326 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brian R. Nacker
are undisputed, the issue is one of law. State v. Williams, 104 Wis.2d 15, 21-22, 310 N.W.2d 601, 604-05 (1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9181 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] May a judge testify at a Canadian administrative tribunal hearing on behalf of an interest group which seeks a binding administrative rule declaring that the Canadian Human Rights Act applies to the Canadian judiciary?
Bar Association’s Commission on Mental and Physical Disability Law and has taught extensively
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876 - 2017-09-20

Kenneth Jordan v. Stephen M. Puckett
kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether the PRC acted according to law; (3) whether its action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13098 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Case of the month - Feb 2016
on their employees. Some background: In 2013, the Wisconsin Legislature passed a law that restricts cities
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb16.pdf - 2016-02-01

[PDF] Kenneth Jordan v. Stephen M. Puckett
) whether the PRC acted according to law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13098 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael S. Alberts, Jr.
the holding in State v. Haseltine, 120 Wis. 2d 92, 96, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984). Under Wisconsin law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3724 - 2005-03-31

Mary Sevcik v. Secura Insurance
has authority to vacate a judgment based on a postjudgment change in the controlling law. Mullen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5921 - 2005-03-31