Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10471 - 10480 of 16513 for commenting.
Search results 10471 - 10480 of 16513 for commenting.
[PDF]
State v. Darrell Tyler
commented on several positive factors relevant to the imposition of sentence. The trial court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9137 - 2017-09-19
commented on several positive factors relevant to the imposition of sentence. The trial court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9137 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
comments that the officer made a display of authority by activating his emergency lights. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33709 - 2014-09-15
comments that the officer made a display of authority by activating his emergency lights. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33709 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to the shooting because Joseph could have made the comment for any number of reasons. Thiel’s proffered testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115155 - 2014-06-23
to the shooting because Joseph could have made the comment for any number of reasons. Thiel’s proffered testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115155 - 2014-06-23
State v. Michael W. Voss, Jr.
court further commented that the tenor of most of Voss' complaints, such as taking issue with the way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8984 - 2005-03-31
court further commented that the tenor of most of Voss' complaints, such as taking issue with the way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8984 - 2005-03-31
State v. Fernando R. Matos
commented that it was not certain that the evidence constituted other acts evidence. We assume without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4112 - 2005-03-31
commented that it was not certain that the evidence constituted other acts evidence. We assume without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4112 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and unequivocal” responses to the court’s questions at the plea hearing. The court’s comments suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51816 - 2010-07-07
and unequivocal” responses to the court’s questions at the plea hearing. The court’s comments suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51816 - 2010-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the question of remedies, we make no comment as to whether Orlowski is entitled to any additional lost wages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70626 - 2011-10-04
the question of remedies, we make no comment as to whether Orlowski is entitled to any additional lost wages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70626 - 2011-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was asked to refer to and comment on these reports. McLemore’s attorney did not object to Dr. Kelley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209861 - 2018-05-10
was asked to refer to and comment on these reports. McLemore’s attorney did not object to Dr. Kelley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209861 - 2018-05-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to review the comment, the notations that they provide judges in using those instructions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210361 - 2018-03-27
to review the comment, the notations that they provide judges in using those instructions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210361 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after trial that “it was a joke that [Maus] represented himself.” The juror’s comments do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115637 - 2017-09-21
after trial that “it was a joke that [Maus] represented himself.” The juror’s comments do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115637 - 2017-09-21