Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10471 - 10480 of 69333 for satisfaction of judgment.
Search results 10471 - 10480 of 69333 for satisfaction of judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Khan, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
. Khan, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court denied. This court affirmed the judgments of conviction, and the two postconviction orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29131 - 2007-06-26
the trial court denied. This court affirmed the judgments of conviction, and the two postconviction orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29131 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s denial of his motion to reopen a default judgment entered against him after he failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
court’s denial of his motion to reopen a default judgment entered against him after he failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. Walker, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
. Walker, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38387 - 2009-07-28
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38387 - 2009-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
by the agency was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented the agency’s will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58975 - 2011-01-18
by the agency was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented the agency’s will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58975 - 2011-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123385 - 2014-10-07
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123385 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
murder and armed robbery. He did not pursue a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59381 - 2011-01-31
murder and armed robbery. He did not pursue a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59381 - 2011-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to judgment because he “engaged in due diligence and filed a written admission with the court admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02
to judgment because he “engaged in due diligence and filed a written admission with the court admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02