Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10481 - 10490 of 83324 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 10481 - 10490 of 83324 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Mark David Hayter
car over, arrested him, and searched him and his vehicle and found nothing. ¶4 The police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5882 - 2017-09-19
car over, arrested him, and searched him and his vehicle and found nothing. ¶4 The police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5882 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark David Hayter
car over, arrested him, and searched him and his vehicle and found nothing. ¶4 The police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6040 - 2017-09-19
car over, arrested him, and searched him and his vehicle and found nothing. ¶4 The police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6040 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141509 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141509 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then had Moore step out of the vehicle and conducted a pat down search. He discovered $2,397 in Moore’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961906 - 2025-05-28
then had Moore step out of the vehicle and conducted a pat down search. He discovered $2,397 in Moore’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961906 - 2025-05-28
CA Blank Order
, Taylor knew the maximum penalty that could be imposed. The same circumstances apply in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101903 - 2013-09-16
, Taylor knew the maximum penalty that could be imposed. The same circumstances apply in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101903 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defect in the plea colloquy. In this case, May’s postconviction motion contained both Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237642 - 2019-03-20
a defect in the plea colloquy. In this case, May’s postconviction motion contained both Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237642 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
State v. Tawana D. Reed
. 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-0472-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12096 - 2017-09-21
. 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-0472-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12096 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and the contents of a computer seized pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30944 - 2007-11-20
and the contents of a computer seized pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30944 - 2007-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
-incrimination under the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions; (8) the search warrant issued by a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113858 - 2014-06-09
-incrimination under the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions; (8) the search warrant issued by a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113858 - 2014-06-09