Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10481 - 10490 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10481 - 10490 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Caminata
that the trial court would immediately sentence Caminata. In exchange for Caminata’s pleas, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2835 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court would immediately sentence Caminata. In exchange for Caminata’s pleas, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2835 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Lintz
for a new trial. He was convicted after a jury trial at which he appeared without an attorney. He raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial. He was convicted after a jury trial at which he appeared without an attorney. He raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samantha M. Penkoske
. At sentencing, the trial court indicated its belief that it was sentencing Penkoske to less prison time than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12230 - 2017-09-21
. At sentencing, the trial court indicated its belief that it was sentencing Penkoske to less prison time than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12230 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph M. Caminata
that the trial court would immediately sentence Caminata. In exchange for Caminata’s pleas, the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2835 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court would immediately sentence Caminata. In exchange for Caminata’s pleas, the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2835 - 2005-03-31
David Gunderman v. Jack Hartwig
in constructing the Hartwigs’ home. The Hartwigs argue that the trial court erroneously determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16157 - 2005-03-31
in constructing the Hartwigs’ home. The Hartwigs argue that the trial court erroneously determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James R. Schiller
for possession of a firearm by a felon. The State argues that the trial court erred because Schiller has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2574 - 2017-09-19
for possession of a firearm by a felon. The State argues that the trial court erred because Schiller has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2574 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief. The trial court denied Payne’s motion on grounds that it was procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59466 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. The trial court denied Payne’s motion on grounds that it was procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59466 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Iron County v. Ryszard Borys
is a public road and enjoining them from blocking access to the road and boat landing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16343 - 2017-09-21
is a public road and enjoining them from blocking access to the road and boat landing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16343 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bobby D. Swift
on his stealing illegal drugs from the victim; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
on his stealing illegal drugs from the victim; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Anthony Mitchell
because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his request to strike a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13848 - 2005-03-31
because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his request to strike a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13848 - 2005-03-31