Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10491 - 10500 of 75269 for public records.
Search results 10491 - 10500 of 75269 for public records.
CA Blank Order
Madison, WI 53707-7857 Katie R. York Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132589 - 2015-01-12
Madison, WI 53707-7857 Katie R. York Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132589 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the Record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714983 - 2023-10-18
reviewed the Record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714983 - 2023-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Racine, WI 53403 Andrew Hinkel Assistant State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208160 - 2018-02-06
Racine, WI 53403 Andrew Hinkel Assistant State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208160 - 2018-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
after deciding that her conviction for “public assistance fraud” in 1981 barred her from working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104788 - 2013-11-25
after deciding that her conviction for “public assistance fraud” in 1981 barred her from working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104788 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Sendejo
that it was ordered by the court. We agree. ¶7 The record clearly demonstrates that Sendejo was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4067 - 2017-09-20
that it was ordered by the court. We agree. ¶7 The record clearly demonstrates that Sendejo was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4067 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100789 - 2017-09-21
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100789 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204965 - 2017-12-08
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204965 - 2017-12-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and did not respond. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575150 - 2022-10-04
, was advised of his right to file a response, and did not respond. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575150 - 2022-10-04
State v. John R. Martin
specimen and to pay costs and fees. The state public defender appointed Len
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11308 - 2005-03-31
specimen and to pay costs and fees. The state public defender appointed Len
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11308 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Martin
specimen and to pay costs and fees. The state public defender appointed Len
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31
specimen and to pay costs and fees. The state public defender appointed Len
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31