Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1051 - 1060 of 7028 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (MEVVAH) Harga Panel Marmer Pvc Pejagoan Kabupaten Kebumen Jawa Tengah.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
without further reference to the restraints in the presence of the jury panel; outside the presence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92113 - 2013-01-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the jury. No. 2017AP1607-CRNM 6 panel.6 Consequently, the record does not permit any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270669 - 2020-07-21

[PDF] State v. Charles E. Jackson
that W.T. was the only African- American member of the jury panel. During voir dire, W.T. told the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6900 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the jury pool were African-American, none ended up on his jury panel. ¶3 “The point at which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74931 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of the sixty-four members of the jury pool were African-American, none ended up on his jury panel. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13

[PDF] State v. David William Newbury
, was selected from a panel of fifty prospective jurors. Thirty-three of the prospective jurors indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Saturnino R. Guerra-Reyna
- the jury panel a person of a "cognizable" class because the prosecutor believes that a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7748 - 2017-09-19

State v. Saturnino R. Guerra-Reyna
presents a unique question: May a prosecutor use a peremptory strike to remove from the jury panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7748 - 2005-03-31

State v. David William Newbury
three alternates, was selected from a panel of fifty prospective jurors. Thirty-three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31

Michael Baxter v. William Lynch
rejected the testimony of Baxter’s expert witness that the body panels were damaged by Lynch’s sandblasting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24912 - 2006-05-02