Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1051 - 1060 of 29821 for des.
Search results 1051 - 1060 of 29821 for des.
Caryl J. Keip v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
and de novo review. See Jicha v. DILHR, 169 Wis.2d 284, 290-91, 485 N.W.2d 256, 258-59 (1992). Keip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15031 - 2005-03-31
and de novo review. See Jicha v. DILHR, 169 Wis.2d 284, 290-91, 485 N.W.2d 256, 258-59 (1992). Keip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15031 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assertion that the standard of review on the first prong of the Batson analysis is de novo. I. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147149 - 2017-09-21
assertion that the standard of review on the first prong of the Batson analysis is de novo. I. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147149 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Turner v. Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52019 - 2010-07-13
methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Turner v. Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52019 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
Clark Wolff v. Grant County Board of Adjustment
and instead No. 01-0476 7 rendered a de novo decision on the merits of their application. The BOA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3632 - 2017-09-19
and instead No. 01-0476 7 rendered a de novo decision on the merits of their application. The BOA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3632 - 2017-09-19
Edward Littlejohn v. Board of Bar Examiners
de novo review, determine whether the BBE's conclusions of law based on the facts which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16674 - 2005-08-06
de novo review, determine whether the BBE's conclusions of law based on the facts which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16674 - 2005-08-06
[PDF]
January 2009 Unpublished Orders
Gurwant Kaleka v. Durand Shell, Inc. 2008AP001127 CR State v. De-Yul Thames 2008AP001138 CR State v. De
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35402 - 2014-09-15
Gurwant Kaleka v. Durand Shell, Inc. 2008AP001127 CR State v. De-Yul Thames 2008AP001138 CR State v. De
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerry Person v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the supporting facts; (2) the Commission’s decision should be reviewed de novo; (3) the Commission failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7213 - 2017-09-20
the supporting facts; (2) the Commission’s decision should be reviewed de novo; (3) the Commission failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7213 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
At a trial de novo, the circuit court found that Village Storage and Erdmann had orally modified the written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105378 - 2013-12-10
At a trial de novo, the circuit court found that Village Storage and Erdmann had orally modified the written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105378 - 2013-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See generally Williams v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 120 Wis. 2d 480, 482, 355 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231938 - 2019-01-15
review de novo. See generally Williams v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 120 Wis. 2d 480, 482, 355 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231938 - 2019-01-15
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
deferred her taxation on a de facto basis. That de facto deferral “adjourned the taxation” within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31
deferred her taxation on a de facto basis. That de facto deferral “adjourned the taxation” within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31