Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10511 - 10520 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 10511 - 10520 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Frontsheet
] that reversed the circuit court's denial of Blatterman's motion to suppress. I. BACKGROUND ¶3 On March 19
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141319 - 2015-06-14
] that reversed the circuit court's denial of Blatterman's motion to suppress. I. BACKGROUND ¶3 On March 19
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141319 - 2015-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Russell L. Dawber
consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5 On June 26, 2001, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5462 - 2017-09-19
consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5 On June 26, 2001, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5462 - 2017-09-19
State v. Russell L. Dawber
on each of those, and sentenced Dawber consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5462 - 2005-03-31
on each of those, and sentenced Dawber consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5462 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven Woerpel v. Reg Gill
ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs for a frivolous appeal, while we are unsure whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11298 - 2017-09-19
ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs for a frivolous appeal, while we are unsure whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11298 - 2017-09-19
Steven Woerpel v. Reg Gill
. We see no error in the trial court’s coverage ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11298 - 2005-03-31
. We see no error in the trial court’s coverage ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11298 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 64
challenge to WIS. STAT. § 971.17(3)(e) in the circuit court and also that he did not file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013112 - 2025-11-20
challenge to WIS. STAT. § 971.17(3)(e) in the circuit court and also that he did not file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013112 - 2025-11-20
2006 WI 131
of his extended supervision, and the court's order denying Brown's motion for reconsideration. ¶2 Brown
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
of his extended supervision, and the court's order denying Brown's motion for reconsideration. ¶2 Brown
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
WI 131
, and the court's order denying Brown's motion for reconsideration. ¶2 Brown contends that the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27514 - 2014-09-15
, and the court's order denying Brown's motion for reconsideration. ¶2 Brown contends that the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27514 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the possession, custody, or control of the plaintiff or its agents. 2. A copy of any videotape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58652 - 2014-09-15
the possession, custody, or control of the plaintiff or its agents. 2. A copy of any videotape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58652 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
offense which are within the possession, custody, or control of the plaintiff or its agents. 2. A copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58652 - 2011-01-11
offense which are within the possession, custody, or control of the plaintiff or its agents. 2. A copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58652 - 2011-01-11