Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10511 - 10520 of 62603 for child support.
Search results 10511 - 10520 of 62603 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions. Specifically, he argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95671 - 2014-09-15
that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions. Specifically, he argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95671 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and a new trial on the ground that he suffered compelling prejudice from evidence presented to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36411 - 2014-09-15
and a new trial on the ground that he suffered compelling prejudice from evidence presented to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36411 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the fact- finding hearing; (2) that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184492 - 2017-09-21
the fact- finding hearing; (2) that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Corrina L. Deichsel
child support obligations. During the initial phases of the investigation, Scott’s wife, Corrina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6404 - 2017-09-19
child support obligations. During the initial phases of the investigation, Scott’s wife, Corrina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6404 - 2017-09-19
State v. David R.W.
of two counts of incest, one count of child enticement and one count of exposing a child to harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10758 - 2005-03-31
of two counts of incest, one count of child enticement and one count of exposing a child to harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10758 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David R.W.
, one count of child enticement and one count of exposing a child to harmful materials, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10758 - 2017-09-20
, one count of child enticement and one count of exposing a child to harmful materials, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10758 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to support a charge that was dismissed at the close of evidence. We conclude that there was no prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36411 - 2009-05-06
to support a charge that was dismissed at the close of evidence. We conclude that there was no prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36411 - 2009-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions. Specifically, he argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions. Specifically, he argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21. The State charged Schick with two counts of sexual assault of a child under the age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432225 - 2021-09-28
809.21. The State charged Schick with two counts of sexual assault of a child under the age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432225 - 2021-09-28
Paula Lucas v. Delano E. Lucas
(providing that there is a rebuttable presumption that “[c]ontinuing the child’s physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6830 - 2005-03-31
(providing that there is a rebuttable presumption that “[c]ontinuing the child’s physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6830 - 2005-03-31