Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10511 - 10520 of 67070 for ct.

State v. Devin D. Lenoir
302, 303 (Ct. App. 1994). If he contends that this is newly discovered evidence, his motion failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12625 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Bud Meyer v. Racine County
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-0231 Cir. Ct. No. 01CV002008 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6097 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Turi Jo Miller v. Terrance J. Halvorson
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2005AP182 Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21226 - 2017-09-21

Linda Lynch v. Donald Parks
. Appeal No. 2004AP650 Cir. Ct. No. 2003CV46 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18008 - 2005-05-04

Ronald L. Paul v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
258, 262, 453 N.W.2d 149, 150 (Ct. App. 1989). We decide questions of law without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10039 - 2005-03-31

State v. Steven L. Stoflet
523, 525 (Ct. App. 1984). Evidentiary Hearing. Here, § 971.30(2)(c), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10548 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
and RULE 809.62. Appeal Nos. 2005AP2280 2005AP2281 Cir. Ct. Nos. 2003CF18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28983 - 2014-09-15

State v. David Haecker
N.W.2d 535, 541 (Ct. App. 1987). Appellate review is tempered by a strong policy against interfering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13375 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
a reasonable basis for the court’s decision. State v. Thompson, 146 Wis. 2d 554, 558-59, 431 N.W.2d 716 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122766 - 2014-09-30

CA Blank Order
.2d 599 (Ct. App. 1991). There is no indication of any such defect here. The State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95843 - 2013-04-21