Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10521 - 10530 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 10521 - 10530 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35670 - 2009-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35670 - 2009-02-25
State v. Brett A. Brobeck
of § 973.12, Stats.”). In this case, Brobeck expressly permitted the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13980 - 2005-03-31
of § 973.12, Stats.”). In this case, Brobeck expressly permitted the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13980 - 2005-03-31
Median Age at Dispo - State
71 70 72 Forfeiture (Uncontested) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traffic (Uncontested) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civil Divorce 209
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/mediandisposummary.xlsx - 2026-04-16
71 70 72 Forfeiture (Uncontested) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traffic (Uncontested) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civil Divorce 209
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/mediandisposummary.xlsx - 2026-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 10, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56500 - 2010-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 10, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56500 - 2010-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 10, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40654 - 2009-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 10, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40654 - 2009-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Louis H. LaCount
should be $100,000, the same court later presided over a civil proceeding in which the court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11225 - 2017-09-19
should be $100,000, the same court later presided over a civil proceeding in which the court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11225 - 2017-09-19
State v. Louis H. LaCount
, and imply that the sum should be $100,000, the same court later presided over a civil proceeding in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11225 - 2005-03-31
, and imply that the sum should be $100,000, the same court later presided over a civil proceeding in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11225 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in its entirety and remand the case to the trial court for an award of appellate attorney fees pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90775 - 2012-12-18
in its entirety and remand the case to the trial court for an award of appellate attorney fees pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90775 - 2012-12-18
State v. Jay Marshall Greene
in this case. Greene relies on Taylor for the proposition that if the original offense is civil, all OAR/OWS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14567 - 2005-03-31
in this case. Greene relies on Taylor for the proposition that if the original offense is civil, all OAR/OWS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14567 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jay Marshall Greene
convictions, a traffic teletype is).1 Greene argues that only civil penalties were applicable in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14567 - 2017-09-21
convictions, a traffic teletype is).1 Greene argues that only civil penalties were applicable in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14567 - 2017-09-21