Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10521 - 10530 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 10521 - 10530 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., to the record de novo. See Garcia v. Regent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12122 - 2017-09-21
apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., to the record de novo. See Garcia v. Regent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12122 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that is reviewed de novo. Portage County v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W.2d 509. “An issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841714 - 2024-08-28
that is reviewed de novo. Portage County v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W.2d 509. “An issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841714 - 2024-08-28
State v. Patricia A.M.
reviews de novo. See Bachowski v. Salamone, 139 Wis.2d 397, 404, 407 N.W.2d 533, 536 (1987). The party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12557 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See Bachowski v. Salamone, 139 Wis.2d 397, 404, 407 N.W.2d 533, 536 (1987). The party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12557 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cory T. Baker
which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Trial counsel’s performance is measured by the objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7361 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Trial counsel’s performance is measured by the objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7361 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
provision is a question of law that we review de novo. Lentz v. Young, 195 Wis. 2d 457, 468, 536 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34747 - 2014-09-15
provision is a question of law that we review de novo. Lentz v. Young, 195 Wis. 2d 457, 468, 536 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34747 - 2014-09-15
State v. Justin P. Brandl
erroneous, but we apply those facts to the law de novo. Id. ¶10 A warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26040 - 2006-07-31
erroneous, but we apply those facts to the law de novo. Id. ¶10 A warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26040 - 2006-07-31
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-138. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6084 - 2005-03-31
of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-138. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Id. However, we “review de novo the ultimate question of ‘whether the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888690 - 2024-12-12
.” Id. However, we “review de novo the ultimate question of ‘whether the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888690 - 2024-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Sankovich
or seizure meets constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12866 - 2017-09-21
or seizure meets constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12866 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Courthouse Electronic Notice Sonya Bice Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27
Courthouse Electronic Notice Sonya Bice Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27