Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10521 - 10530 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10521 - 10530 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
causing bodily harm. Howard argues that the trial court erred in permitting the State to introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293785 - 2020-10-06
causing bodily harm. Howard argues that the trial court erred in permitting the State to introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293785 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
, no judicial construction was required; and (3) the trial court erred by construing the agreement's terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13993 - 2014-09-15
, no judicial construction was required; and (3) the trial court erred by construing the agreement's terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13993 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
and one-half years. After soliciting input from the parties, the trial court amended the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103466 - 2013-10-29
and one-half years. After soliciting input from the parties, the trial court amended the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103466 - 2013-10-29
Scott Booth v. Tomorrow Valley Cooperative Services
is supported by credible evidence; (2) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10311 - 2005-03-31
is supported by credible evidence; (2) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10311 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay, and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29707 - 2007-07-16
that: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay, and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29707 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
Linda M. Goberville v. Brad J. Goberville
schedule. 1 Brad argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by making no reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7650 - 2017-09-19
schedule. 1 Brad argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by making no reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7650 - 2017-09-19
Todd Stendahl v. A & M Insulation Co.
affirm the trial court’s decision to strike the affidavit and the grant of summary judgment. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15040 - 2005-03-31
affirm the trial court’s decision to strike the affidavit and the grant of summary judgment. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15040 - 2005-03-31
Linda M. Goberville v. Brad J. Goberville
of a divorce judgment ordering a physical placement schedule.[1] Brad argues the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7650 - 2005-03-31
of a divorce judgment ordering a physical placement schedule.[1] Brad argues the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Julio G.
G., following a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
G., following a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
was required; and (3) the trial court erred by construing the agreement's terms relating to valuation of real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13993 - 2005-03-31
was required; and (3) the trial court erred by construing the agreement's terms relating to valuation of real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13993 - 2005-03-31