Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10531 - 10540 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 10531 - 10540 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
is warranted for the State's failure to preserve arguably exculpatory evidence; (3) whether he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31
is warranted for the State's failure to preserve arguably exculpatory evidence; (3) whether he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the validity of the accused’s statements and whether suppression is warranted. Given Luckett’s wholesale
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
the validity of the accused’s statements and whether suppression is warranted. Given Luckett’s wholesale
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
for reconsideration. She argues that a new factor warrants modification of her sentence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898626 - 2025-01-09
for reconsideration. She argues that a new factor warrants modification of her sentence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898626 - 2025-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dispatch center, and what they tell us is the driver’s license status, the wants or warrants check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293794 - 2020-10-06
dispatch center, and what they tell us is the driver’s license status, the wants or warrants check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293794 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Anquion Johnson
erred in denying his motion for mistrial. He contends that a mistrial was warranted because of: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8884 - 2017-09-19
erred in denying his motion for mistrial. He contends that a mistrial was warranted because of: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8884 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
was not otherwise sufficient to warrant a hearing. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of Earls’s ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129269 - 2014-11-18
was not otherwise sufficient to warrant a hearing. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of Earls’s ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129269 - 2014-11-18
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
was not required and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Pursuant to a search warrant, police searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
was not required and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Pursuant to a search warrant, police searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony A. Parker
outside of Wisconsin is a breach of a plea agreement or new factor warranting sentence modification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2672 - 2005-03-31
outside of Wisconsin is a breach of a plea agreement or new factor warranting sentence modification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2672 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
evidence to the defendant; (2) whether dismissal is warranted for the State's failure to preserve arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9299 - 2017-09-19
evidence to the defendant; (2) whether dismissal is warranted for the State's failure to preserve arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9299 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher V. Teague
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” These facts must be judged against an “objective standard: would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” These facts must be judged against an “objective standard: would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31