Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10531 - 10540 of 69002 for he.
Search results 10531 - 10540 of 69002 for he.
State v. Bryan K. Heckman
concentration contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). He contends that the trial court erred in convicting him of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11134 - 2005-03-31
concentration contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). He contends that the trial court erred in convicting him of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11134 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale Pultz
that the trial court erred in issuing a contempt order against him because: (1) he was not provided notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8199 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred in issuing a contempt order against him because: (1) he was not provided notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8199 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Victor T. Williams
-2000). 1 He raises a number of issues. We affirm. ¶2 In 1984, Williams entered no-contest pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3421 - 2017-09-19
-2000). 1 He raises a number of issues. We affirm. ¶2 In 1984, Williams entered no-contest pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3421 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Michael was committed under Wis. Stat. § 51.20 after an incident in which he drove his bicycle erratically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107481 - 2014-01-28
Michael was committed under Wis. Stat. § 51.20 after an incident in which he drove his bicycle erratically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107481 - 2014-01-28
County of Walworth v. Jason M. Aarud
of conviction for driving while intoxicated, first offense. Aarud argues that he was seized without reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5314 - 2005-03-31
of conviction for driving while intoxicated, first offense. Aarud argues that he was seized without reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5314 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to the entry of West’s guilty plea.[2] In response to our order, West advises that he will not pursue the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
to the entry of West’s guilty plea.[2] In response to our order, West advises that he will not pursue the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
State v. Mack A. Kradenych
Kradenych, we affirm. ¶2 Kradenych was charged with one count of burglary. He moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
Kradenych, we affirm. ¶2 Kradenych was charged with one count of burglary. He moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Christina C. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83327 - 2012-06-04
, Christina C. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83327 - 2012-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Bobby Chambers
) & (2) and 939.05, STATS. He claims that the trial court No. 96-0379-CR -2- erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10354 - 2017-09-20
) & (2) and 939.05, STATS. He claims that the trial court No. 96-0379-CR -2- erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10354 - 2017-09-20
Tommy Smith, Jr. v. Daren Swenson
on whether he could have prevailed in postconviction proceedings on any of the issues listed above. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18681 - 2005-06-22
on whether he could have prevailed in postconviction proceedings on any of the issues listed above. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18681 - 2005-06-22