Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10541 - 10550 of 30175 for de.

State v. Patricia A. Weed
conclusions of law de novo. Id. ¶7 A defendant’s right to testify is a fundamental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4032 - 2005-03-31

09AP935 State v. Michael A. Woodford
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] Michael A. Woodford appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
¶8 This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048622 - 2025-12-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that decision reviewed de novo by the circuit court and then by this court, but was informed that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112074 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 115
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26722 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31931 - 2008-02-25

Willie Hampton v. Jose T. Lloren, M.D.
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Bauernfeind v. Zell, 190 Wis.2d 701
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11409 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Fidelis I. Omegbu v. Thomas A. Mason Co., Inc.
. ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment.4 See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13924 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
question we review de novo. See id., ¶9. To establish a denial of this right, the defendant must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255609 - 2020-03-02

[PDF] Jill Winnega v. North Central Health Protection Plan
of the insurance policy and therefore entails a de novo review. See Lambert v. Wrensch, 135 Wis.2d 105, 115, 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13648 - 2017-09-21