Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10551 - 10560 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 10551 - 10560 of 58340 for speedy trial.
James A. Kirner v. Roland and Sheila Froese
Diehl. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly concluded that the Froeses were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12860 - 2013-06-03
Diehl. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly concluded that the Froeses were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12860 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Lewis
motion to modify his sentence. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3610 - 2017-09-19
motion to modify his sentence. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3610 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We reject London’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88603 - 2014-09-15
argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We reject London’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88603 - 2014-09-15
Colleen M. Gray v. Earl P. Gray
average annual income. Earl contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14984 - 2005-03-31
average annual income. Earl contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14984 - 2005-03-31
Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
and cause remanded for a new trial. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan and Fine, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31
and cause remanded for a new trial. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan and Fine, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31
Harley Paws, Inc. v. Mohns, Inc.
., $21,958.82 in damages, following a court trial. Mohns argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3265 - 2005-03-31
., $21,958.82 in damages, following a court trial. Mohns argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter A. Moss
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward D. Lewis
. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress a firearm found in a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress a firearm found in a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Billie C. Smith
by a felon, both as a habitual criminal. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5436 - 2017-09-19
by a felon, both as a habitual criminal. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5436 - 2017-09-19
State v. Miguel Angel Santana-Lopez
, see Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1).[1] He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15279 - 2005-03-31
, see Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1).[1] He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15279 - 2005-03-31