Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10551 - 10560 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10551 - 10560 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Glen P. Walker
§ 974.06, Stats., motion without a hearing. Because we conclude that the motion’s allegations that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12515 - 2005-03-31
§ 974.06, Stats., motion without a hearing. Because we conclude that the motion’s allegations that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
supported the visits. ¶3 The trial court denied the motion. The trial court characterized the dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30796 - 2014-09-15
supported the visits. ¶3 The trial court denied the motion. The trial court characterized the dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30796 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Glen P. Walker
without a hearing. Because we conclude that the motion’s allegations that trial counsel coerced Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12515 - 2017-09-21
without a hearing. Because we conclude that the motion’s allegations that trial counsel coerced Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12515 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffery L. McCullar
) and 939.63(1)(a)1, STATS. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15344 - 2017-09-21
) and 939.63(1)(a)1, STATS. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15344 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David G. Grimm
is arguing that the trial court erred by believing the State's witnesses and rejecting his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9124 - 2017-09-19
is arguing that the trial court erred by believing the State's witnesses and rejecting his testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9124 - 2017-09-19
Cliff Navis Company, Inc. v. Anthony Shomberg
work performed by Cliff Navis Company, Inc.[2] Shomberg contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11286 - 2005-03-31
work performed by Cliff Navis Company, Inc.[2] Shomberg contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11286 - 2005-03-31
James A. Kirner v. Roland and Sheila Froese
Diehl. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly concluded that the Froeses were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12860 - 2005-03-31
Diehl. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly concluded that the Froeses were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12860 - 2005-03-31
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
that the trial court improperly amended the judgment of conviction and ordered her to pay extradition costs after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13760 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court improperly amended the judgment of conviction and ordered her to pay extradition costs after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13760 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry L. Van Drese
to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. The trial court sentenced Van Drese to fifty days in jail, a fine and assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13422 - 2005-03-31
to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. The trial court sentenced Van Drese to fifty days in jail, a fine and assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13422 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the trial court imposed a twenty-year prison sentence and awarded Walker 700 days of presentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138784 - 2017-09-21
, the trial court imposed a twenty-year prison sentence and awarded Walker 700 days of presentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138784 - 2017-09-21