Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10561 - 10570 of 63559 for records.
Search results 10561 - 10570 of 63559 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, I conclude 1 This appeal is decided by one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240762 - 2019-05-14
and record, I conclude 1 This appeal is decided by one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240762 - 2019-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP632-CRNM 2 of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717592 - 2023-10-25
. No. 2021AP632-CRNM 2 of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717592 - 2023-10-25
[PDF]
Anthony J. Bogdanovich v. Town of Three Lakes Board of Supervisors
, that the record does not support the board’s decision and that its actions were arbitrary, oppressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2977 - 2017-09-19
, that the record does not support the board’s decision and that its actions were arbitrary, oppressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2977 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754813 - 2024-01-25
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754813 - 2024-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801441 - 2024-05-15
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801441 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his innocence.1 Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735169 - 2023-12-05
his innocence.1 Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735169 - 2023-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision on certiorari review. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170190 - 2017-09-21
decision on certiorari review. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170190 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20