Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10561 - 10570 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 10561 - 10570 of 65039 for timed.
COURT OF APPEALS
, asked in separate questions whether Donald or Patricia was driving at the time of the accident, answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50145 - 2010-05-17
, asked in separate questions whether Donald or Patricia was driving at the time of the accident, answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50145 - 2010-05-17
97-03 SCR Chapter 72 - Retention & Maintenance
Rules, chapter 72, providing periods of time for the maintenance and retention of court records
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1190 - 2005-03-31
Rules, chapter 72, providing periods of time for the maintenance and retention of court records
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Jackson
the entire 6 years of possible repeater penalty enhancement to the maximum confinement time for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5134 - 2017-09-19
the entire 6 years of possible repeater penalty enhancement to the maximum confinement time for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5134 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his “Motion Requesting Time Served With 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365541 - 2021-05-11
his “Motion Requesting Time Served With 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365541 - 2021-05-11
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
that time. The CHIPS extension order entered on October 13th was expressly agreed by the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31
that time. The CHIPS extension order entered on October 13th was expressly agreed by the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andre D. Crockett
In November 1997, Crockett filed a second motion in the trial court, this time alleging that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3247 - 2005-03-31
In November 1997, Crockett filed a second motion in the trial court, this time alleging that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3247 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150637 - 2017-09-21
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150637 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thao Lor
of the time, the girls were supplied with and encouraged to consume marijuana and alcohol. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13519 - 2017-09-21
of the time, the girls were supplied with and encouraged to consume marijuana and alcohol. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Strutz
while driving and collided with another vehicle, causing the death of three people. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
while driving and collided with another vehicle, causing the death of three people. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and read in at sentencing. The prosecution agreed to argue for substantial prison time but take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15
and read in at sentencing. The prosecution agreed to argue for substantial prison time but take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15