Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10571 - 10580 of 12890 for prosecuting.
Search results 10571 - 10580 of 12890 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Juan M. Orta
defendant ever caught by police, prosecuted by the state, and litigating a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5155 - 2017-09-19
defendant ever caught by police, prosecuted by the state, and litigating a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5155 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The memorandum asserted that based on the sentences imposed in those other cases, “the prosecution’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142699 - 2017-09-21
The memorandum asserted that based on the sentences imposed in those other cases, “the prosecution’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 The statute also requires the court to determine whether the matter has “prosecutive merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584811 - 2022-11-02
3 The statute also requires the court to determine whether the matter has “prosecutive merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584811 - 2022-11-02
[PDF]
State v. David Buck
. Miranda held that the prosecution could not use statements resulting from a custodial interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10713 - 2017-09-20
. Miranda held that the prosecution could not use statements resulting from a custodial interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10713 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mary Lou McClain
reason, the court should permit withdrawal unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2920 - 2005-03-31
reason, the court should permit withdrawal unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Crystal L. Bizzle
costs representing not specific disbursements made by the state in arresting and prosecuting Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12990 - 2017-09-21
costs representing not specific disbursements made by the state in arresting and prosecuting Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carter T. Hopson
stemmed from Hopson offering one of the victims money in exchange for the victim’s refusal to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6958 - 2017-09-20
stemmed from Hopson offering one of the victims money in exchange for the victim’s refusal to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6958 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because Alderman Zielinski’s “complaint and prosecution against Brew House were undoubtedly stronger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
because Alderman Zielinski’s “complaint and prosecution against Brew House were undoubtedly stronger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Craig M.E.
for prosecution. When they began to discuss the details of the assaults he “was a little nervous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2741 - 2017-09-19
for prosecution. When they began to discuss the details of the assaults he “was a little nervous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2741 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ronald A. Arthur v. Hanson & Leja Lumber
, malicious prosecution, timber theft, defamation, abuse of process, and misrepresentation. ¶6 In August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14366 - 2014-09-15
, malicious prosecution, timber theft, defamation, abuse of process, and misrepresentation. ¶6 In August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14366 - 2014-09-15

