Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10571 - 10580 of 63601 for records.
Search results 10571 - 10580 of 63601 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
Ronald A. Arthur v. Randy Keefe
is without support in the record. There is no record of Arthur petitioning the court to advance this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
is without support in the record. There is no record of Arthur petitioning the court to advance this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Terry Lee Paul
that his exemplary conduct in the prison constitutes a new factor. A defendant’s prison record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12585 - 2017-09-21
that his exemplary conduct in the prison constitutes a new factor. A defendant’s prison record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to waive the costs of preparing a transcript. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195278 - 2017-09-21
to waive the costs of preparing a transcript. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914223 - 2025-02-19
was advised of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914223 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
characterizes as an error in computation that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31141 - 2014-09-15
characterizes as an error in computation that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Zack
exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven Zack. Because the records show that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15873 - 2017-09-21
exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven Zack. Because the records show that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
right to file a response. She has not done so. Upon an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024098 - 2025-10-15
right to file a response. She has not done so. Upon an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024098 - 2025-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, 1 The Honorable Charles H. Constantine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=406615 - 2021-08-11
and record, 1 The Honorable Charles H. Constantine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=406615 - 2021-08-11