Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10571 - 10580 of 21471 for warrants.
Search results 10571 - 10580 of 21471 for warrants.
State v. Eduardo Alicea
to the defendants did not warrant a mistrial because, in essence it believed that the “five words can be disregarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
to the defendants did not warrant a mistrial because, in essence it believed that the “five words can be disregarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the jail phone calls—warrants a new trial. We reject Murray’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798404 - 2024-05-08
, the jail phone calls—warrants a new trial. We reject Murray’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798404 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Santiago
on this issue. I. BACKGROUND In January 1993, police obtained a warrant to search Santiago's residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7862 - 2017-09-19
on this issue. I. BACKGROUND In January 1993, police obtained a warrant to search Santiago's residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7862 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph D. Haas
the tracking device without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
the tracking device without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Pierce
warranted. We disagree. ¶23 Sentencing is committed to the discretion of the trial court. Ocanas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18698 - 2017-09-21
warranted. We disagree. ¶23 Sentencing is committed to the discretion of the trial court. Ocanas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18698 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lisa A. Carter
by counsel’s performance and that discretionary reversal is not warranted. We affirm the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
by counsel’s performance and that discretionary reversal is not warranted. We affirm the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2008
, warranting an award for punitive damages. Both Mathews and American Family filed answers that included
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31945 - 2014-09-15
, warranting an award for punitive damages. Both Mathews and American Family filed answers that included
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31945 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
” to the exclusionary rule applies to obviate the constitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment Warrant requirement
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061306 - 2026-01-08
” to the exclusionary rule applies to obviate the constitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment Warrant requirement
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061306 - 2026-01-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
warrant at the auto body shop, although nobody was located on the premises. Police recovered two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124837 - 2017-09-21
warrant at the auto body shop, although nobody was located on the premises. Police recovered two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
” to the exclusionary rule applies to obviate the constitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment Warrant requirement
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071210 - 2026-01-28
” to the exclusionary rule applies to obviate the constitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment Warrant requirement
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071210 - 2026-01-28