Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10581 - 10590 of 30191 for de.
Search results 10581 - 10590 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
Sherry Mulligan v. Barbara J. Koehler
of law de novo. The determination to be made in this case is whether § 100.20(5) attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10417 - 2017-09-20
of law de novo. The determination to be made in this case is whether § 100.20(5) attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10417 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594971 - 2022-11-29
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594971 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061842 - 2026-01-14
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061842 - 2026-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion to modify a sentence if a defendant shows the existence of a new factor. Id., ¶33. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
discretion to modify a sentence if a defendant shows the existence of a new factor. Id., ¶33. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
State v. Ronnie C. Barnes
that we review de novo. See State v. Lipke, 186 Wis.2d 358, 363, 521 N.W.2d 444, 445-46 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State v. Lipke, 186 Wis.2d 358, 363, 521 N.W.2d 444, 445-46 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14283 - 2005-03-31
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of the test is not entitled to any deference and should be reviewed de novo, as an issue of first impression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13021 - 2005-03-31
of the test is not entitled to any deference and should be reviewed de novo, as an issue of first impression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13021 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applies the relevant legal principles to those facts de novo. State v. Hogan, 2015 WI 76, ¶32, 364 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248776 - 2019-10-17
applies the relevant legal principles to those facts de novo. State v. Hogan, 2015 WI 76, ¶32, 364 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248776 - 2019-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 163. A court’s competency to proceed is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
.2d 163. A court’s competency to proceed is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29887 - 2007-08-01
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29887 - 2007-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Statutory interpretation and application are also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69286 - 2011-08-08
, however, is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Statutory interpretation and application are also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69286 - 2011-08-08