Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10581 - 10590 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10581 - 10590 of 58506 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing. London also argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88603 - 2012-10-22
a hearing. London also argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88603 - 2012-10-22
State v. Edward D. Lewis
. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress a firearm found in a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress a firearm found in a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FRW Corporation v. City of New Berlin
, pursuant to FRW's motion for summary judgment. FRW has cross-appealed from the portion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7789 - 2017-09-19
, pursuant to FRW's motion for summary judgment. FRW has cross-appealed from the portion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7789 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial in favor of a trial to the court. Towns also stipulated to the truth of the allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45542 - 2010-01-11
a jury trial in favor of a trial to the court. Towns also stipulated to the truth of the allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45542 - 2010-01-11
Janet Steinbruner v. The McClone Agency, Inc.
the statute, the trial court computed Steinbruner’s damages on the basis of Steinbruner’s gross wage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19826 - 2005-10-04
the statute, the trial court computed Steinbruner’s damages on the basis of Steinbruner’s gross wage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19826 - 2005-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because the No. 2018AP159-CR 2 trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234357 - 2019-02-12
to a new trial because the No. 2018AP159-CR 2 trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234357 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Lewis
motion to modify his sentence. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3610 - 2017-09-19
motion to modify his sentence. Lewis claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3610 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
relief.[2] We conclude Dengsavang was entitled to a Machner hearing on his claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111198 - 2014-05-22
relief.[2] We conclude Dengsavang was entitled to a Machner hearing on his claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111198 - 2014-05-22
Harley Paws, Inc. v. Mohns, Inc.
., $21,958.82 in damages, following a court trial. Mohns argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3265 - 2005-03-31
., $21,958.82 in damages, following a court trial. Mohns argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter A. Moss
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31