Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10591 - 10600 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 10591 - 10600 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
is no longer in custody, and thus, he cannot pursue this motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06; and (2) the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
is no longer in custody, and thus, he cannot pursue this motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06; and (2) the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Thomas L. Seeley
sentence, and an order denying his postconviction motions. He claims that: (1) the prosecutor committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11076 - 2017-09-19
sentence, and an order denying his postconviction motions. He claims that: (1) the prosecutor committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11076 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to suppress a videotape; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12675 - 2017-09-21
erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to suppress a videotape; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12675 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
entered after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32109 - 2014-09-15
entered after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32109 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shane M. Ferguson
Ferguson argues that the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2112 - 2017-09-19
Ferguson argues that the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2112 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to suppress a videotape; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12674 - 2017-09-21
erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to suppress a videotape; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12674 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 78
in Illinois and had been brought to court on the interstate detainer. ¶6 At a motion hearing on September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15
in Illinois and had been brought to court on the interstate detainer. ¶6 At a motion hearing on September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shane M. Ferguson
suppression motion. He contends that the police were not engaged in a community caretaker function when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2112 - 2005-03-31
suppression motion. He contends that the police were not engaged in a community caretaker function when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The issue is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632045 - 2023-03-14
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The issue is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632045 - 2023-03-14
State v. Thomas L. Seeley
-degree intentional homicide, the resulting sentence, and an order denying his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11076 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide, the resulting sentence, and an order denying his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11076 - 2005-03-31