Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10591 - 10600 of 58195 for o j.
Search results 10591 - 10600 of 58195 for o j.
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Marquette County: RICHARD O. WRIGHT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91012 - 2014-09-15
court for Marquette County: RICHARD O. WRIGHT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91012 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that police contacts with Kingsley have resulted in a department-wide response based on “[o]fficer safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
that police contacts with Kingsley have resulted in a department-wide response based on “[o]fficer safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Rock Prairie c/o Melvin Graham-Jackson 2002 Dunn Place Madison, WI 53713 You are hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
Rock Prairie c/o Melvin Graham-Jackson 2002 Dunn Place Madison, WI 53713 You are hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
Caldwell did “n[o]t want any problems” in front of the tavern. When Caldwell started to go back inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64240 - 2011-05-16
Caldwell did “n[o]t want any problems” in front of the tavern. When Caldwell started to go back inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64240 - 2011-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
]o justify an investigatory stop, the police must have a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
]o justify an investigatory stop, the police must have a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
moved “for an [o]rder to reclassify above [f]elony Class C under [2001 Wis.] Act 109 ... to a [l]esser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64465 - 2011-05-23
moved “for an [o]rder to reclassify above [f]elony Class C under [2001 Wis.] Act 109 ... to a [l]esser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64465 - 2011-05-23
CA Blank Order
, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 293, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). McCall also complains that “[n]o contest is like pleading
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98067 - 2013-06-18
, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 293, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). McCall also complains that “[n]o contest is like pleading
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98067 - 2013-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(“[O]nly dispositive issues need be addressed.”). No. 2023AP1227-CR 6 Pederson also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818007 - 2024-06-25
(“[O]nly dispositive issues need be addressed.”). No. 2023AP1227-CR 6 Pederson also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818007 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
___. ¶11 “[O]nce stopped, the driver may be asked questions reasonably related to the nature of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147170 - 2017-09-21
___. ¶11 “[O]nce stopped, the driver may be asked questions reasonably related to the nature of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147170 - 2017-09-21