Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10591 - 10600 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10591 - 10600 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Harley Paws, Inc. v. Mohns, Inc.
., $21,958.82 in damages, following a court trial. Mohns argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3265 - 2005-03-31
., $21,958.82 in damages, following a court trial. Mohns argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter A. Moss
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3161 - 2005-03-31
Colleen M. Gray v. Earl P. Gray
average annual income. Earl contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14984 - 2005-03-31
average annual income. Earl contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14984 - 2005-03-31
State v. Billie C. Smith
, both as a habitual criminal. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective, and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5436 - 2005-03-31
, both as a habitual criminal. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective, and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5436 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricky A. Myhre
on appeal and after the subsequent trial the court imposed an increased sentence. Based on our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25935 - 2006-07-18
on appeal and after the subsequent trial the court imposed an increased sentence. Based on our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25935 - 2006-07-18
State v. Peter A. Moss
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter A. Moss
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3162 - 2005-03-31
sell, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 167.10(2).[1] He also challenges the trial court's judgment forfeiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We reject London’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88603 - 2014-09-15
argues that the cumulative effect of his stated claims warrants a new trial. We reject London’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88603 - 2014-09-15
State v. Emanuel G.
not challenge the jury’s finding that there were grounds to terminate his parental rights, or the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18453 - 2005-06-06
not challenge the jury’s finding that there were grounds to terminate his parental rights, or the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18453 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
State v. Billie C. Smith
by a felon, both as a habitual criminal. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5436 - 2017-09-19
by a felon, both as a habitual criminal. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5436 - 2017-09-19