Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 30172 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo. To demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242615 - 2019-06-25

Edward Littlejohn v. Board of Bar Examiners
de novo review, determine whether the BBE's conclusions of law based on the facts which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16674 - 2005-03-31

John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
rel. Smits v. City of De Pere Board of Police & Fire Commissioners, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 310 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
assertion that the standard of review on the first prong of the Batson analysis is de novo. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2015-08-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
salary. ¶6 Carrie sought a de novo hearing on the child support issue, and she retained counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218468 - 2018-08-30

2008 WI APP 54
on summary judgment is de novo. Moreover, we may affirm the circuit court for any reason. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32124 - 2008-04-29

[PDF] January 2009 Unpublished Orders
Gurwant Kaleka v. Durand Shell, Inc. 2008AP001127 CR State v. De-Yul Thames 2008AP001138 CR State v. De
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35402 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. American Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶23, 268 Wis. 2d 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091733 - 2026-03-18

COURT OF APPEALS
two parking spaces.” On our de novo review, we agree.[1] II. ¶6 We evaluate de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36689 - 2009-06-08

County of Fond du Lac v. Kevin C. Derksen
a defendant is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. See Dungan v. County of Pierce, 170 Wis. 2d 89, 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6492 - 2005-03-31