Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 30165 for de.

Caryl J. Keip v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
and de novo review. See Jicha v. DILHR, 169 Wis.2d 284, 290-91, 485 N.W.2d 256, 258-59 (1992). Keip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15031 - 2005-03-31

2008 WI APP 54
on summary judgment is de novo. Moreover, we may affirm the circuit court for any reason. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32124 - 2008-04-29

Edward Littlejohn v. Board of Bar Examiners
de novo review, determine whether the BBE's conclusions of law based on the facts which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16674 - 2005-03-31

John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
rel. Smits v. City of De Pere Board of Police & Fire Commissioners, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 310 N.W.2d 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2013-09-24

[PDF] John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
in deciding that the holding in State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere Board of Police & Fire Commissioners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14599 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo. To demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242615 - 2019-06-25

[PDF] January 2009 Unpublished Orders
Gurwant Kaleka v. Durand Shell, Inc. 2008AP001127 CR State v. De-Yul Thames 2008AP001138 CR State v. De
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35402 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. American Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶23, 268 Wis. 2d 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091733 - 2026-03-18

COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66789 - 2011-06-27

COURT OF APPEALS
two parking spaces.” On our de novo review, we agree.[1] II. ¶6 We evaluate de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36689 - 2009-06-08