Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 10406 for ed.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 10406 for ed.
COURT OF APPEALS
Translated from Latin, nunc pro tunc means “now for then.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1100 (8th ed. 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
Translated from Latin, nunc pro tunc means “now for then.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1100 (8th ed. 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
WI App 110
interview prior to the hearing, agreed with the State, determining that Attorney Knoeller “act[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87140 - 2014-09-15
interview prior to the hearing, agreed with the State, determining that Attorney Knoeller “act[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87140 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 53
.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1543 (8th ed. 2004) defines “trial” as “[a] formal judicial examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36010 - 2014-09-15
.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1543 (8th ed. 2004) defines “trial” as “[a] formal judicial examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36010 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher Anderson
Wisconsin has “adopt[ed] the analysis used by the United States Supreme Court in Jenkins and Fletcher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21458 - 2006-02-20
Wisconsin has “adopt[ed] the analysis used by the United States Supreme Court in Jenkins and Fletcher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21458 - 2006-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in transferring the drugs to the victim. Counsel confirmed that he had “thoroughly discuss[ed] this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318045 - 2020-12-23
in transferring the drugs to the victim. Counsel confirmed that he had “thoroughly discuss[ed] this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318045 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
Stephen G. Walker v. Monte B. Tobin
C.J.S., Judgments § 341 (1947)). The adoption of § 806.07, STATS., within the WRCP “attempt[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10579 - 2017-09-20
C.J.S., Judgments § 341 (1947)). The adoption of § 806.07, STATS., within the WRCP “attempt[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10579 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
answered, “Yes.” On cross-examination, when asked if he “hand[ed Williams] a copy of the warrant prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119232 - 2026-05-21
answered, “Yes.” On cross-examination, when asked if he “hand[ed Williams] a copy of the warrant prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119232 - 2026-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was “concern[ed]” about Norman’s and Donna’s “ability to understand age-appropriate development for children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97344 - 2013-05-28
was “concern[ed]” about Norman’s and Donna’s “ability to understand age-appropriate development for children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97344 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of A.T. would proceed beyond a preliminary hearing; and (6) counsel “aid[ed] and abett[ed]” the DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177795 - 2017-09-21
of A.T. would proceed beyond a preliminary hearing; and (6) counsel “aid[ed] and abett[ed]” the DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177795 - 2017-09-21
Thomas J. Justmann v. Portage County
consistent results from case to case, see 1 Orgel, Valuation Under the Law of Eminent Domain § 65 (2d ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7124 - 2005-03-31
consistent results from case to case, see 1 Orgel, Valuation Under the Law of Eminent Domain § 65 (2d ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7124 - 2005-03-31