Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 9547 for jurors.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 9547 for jurors.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat.] § 805.09(2) [2009-10] … in that the same 5/6ths of the jurors did not agree upon all questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79258 - 2012-03-07
. Stat.] § 805.09(2) [2009-10] … in that the same 5/6ths of the jurors did not agree upon all questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79258 - 2012-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the jurors; (4) trial counsel was ineffective by failing to request individual polling; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
the jurors; (4) trial counsel was ineffective by failing to request individual polling; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the jurors did not agree upon all questions with respect to the same claims.” The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79258 - 2014-09-15
of the jurors did not agree upon all questions with respect to the same claims.” The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
U.S. 436 (1966), and that the trial court erred in dismissing an extra juror after the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60751 - 2014-09-15
U.S. 436 (1966), and that the trial court erred in dismissing an extra juror after the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60751 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in dismissing an extra juror after the evidence in the case was closed but before the jury started its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60751 - 2011-03-23
in dismissing an extra juror after the evidence in the case was closed but before the jury started its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60751 - 2011-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
felonies. During jury deliberations, he moved for a mistrial on the ground that three jurors saw him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307313 - 2020-11-24
felonies. During jury deliberations, he moved for a mistrial on the ground that three jurors saw him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307313 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2015AP837-NM 6 After the jury returned its verdict, the court asked the jurors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143491 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP837-NM 6 After the jury returned its verdict, the court asked the jurors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143491 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
be raised. After the jury returned its verdict, the court asked the jurors, “Are these verdicts as turned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143491 - 2015-06-29
be raised. After the jury returned its verdict, the court asked the jurors, “Are these verdicts as turned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143491 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Julian Lopez
improperly denied his request for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the jurors received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6676 - 2017-09-20
improperly denied his request for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the jurors received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6676 - 2017-09-20
State v. Julian Lopez
for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the jurors received extraneous, prejudicial information prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6676 - 2005-03-31
for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the jurors received extraneous, prejudicial information prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6676 - 2005-03-31