Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 16059 for probate.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 16059 for probate.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no basis for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Jordan’s probation. Jordan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189234 - 2017-09-21
there is no basis for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Jordan’s probation. Jordan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189234 - 2017-09-21
Jason Amundson v. Village of Fairchild
employment provided “[H]is starting date will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3517 - 2005-03-31
employment provided “[H]is starting date will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3517 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by his probation agent. We affirm. ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. Holloway has multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56446 - 2010-11-29
by his probation agent. We affirm. ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. Holloway has multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56446 - 2010-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jason Amundson v. Village of Fairchild
will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain his State certification (sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3517 - 2017-09-19
will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain his State certification (sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3517 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and two years’ extended supervision. The court placed Jones on probation for three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
and two years’ extended supervision. The court placed Jones on probation for three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. ¶2 Diehl first raises several challenges to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28
of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. ¶2 Diehl first raises several challenges to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
petition for certiorari review of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. No. 2006AP1664
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30999 - 2014-09-15
petition for certiorari review of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. No. 2006AP1664
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15